If you have a long heavy single shot 30-30 with a scope vs. a short lever action or semi auto .308, the .308 is better. But a lever 3030 is better than a long scoped bolt .308 Mostly depends on what the gun is. Not so much the caliber
The 7.62×39 vs 308 vs 7.62x54R debate has raged within hunting and shooting circles for many decades now. They're all proven cartridges with different strengths and weaknesses, but the question remains: which one should you be using? You're not alone if you're confused about the differences.
The 7.62×51mm NATO (official NATO nomenclature 7.62 NATO) is a rimless bottlenecked rifle cartridge developed in the 1950s as a standard for small arms among NATO countries.
7.62mm Carbine Resources The Simonov Semi-Automatic Carbine SKS 7.62×39 Hunting Rifle Version (OP-SKS) is an assault carbine in Escape from Tarkov . Molot OP-SKS Carbine is designed for loading with 7.62×39 – the most popular ammunition. Multiple explosives, submachine gun seized in Stockyards: police – Inside, they allegedly found a 9mm Sterling Submachine gun with a folding stock,
Is the 7.62 x 51 NATO as powerfull as the 30 – 06 since the US switched from the 30 – 06 to the shorter 7.62 x 51 I am wondering if they have the same power or the Military changed its doctrine and just opt for a 30-06 has more feet per second and foot pounds of energy on impact. So it is more powerful.
Jun 08, 2018 · .30 06 vs 6.5 Creedmoore from another article here on TAG.
The 7.62×51/.308 was designed to use 175gr pills as about the longest bullet that could be loaded with.
By now at least everyone should know that it's ill-advised to shoot the civilian .308 in a military rifle chambered for the 7.62 NATO round (7.62 x 51) Now the question I have is.
.does the same analogy apply to the 30-06 civilian vs the 30-06 (7.62 x 63) the caliber used in the M1.
The 7.62×63 (.30-'06) can load 220 grain bullets. So the .30-'06 would have greater knockdown power and at longer ranges. I have fired both the M14 Simply do the math. The 30-06 is a longer cartridge than the 308 and can hold more powder. Also the M1 Garand had a longer barrel than the M14.
Ballistically the 7.62×51 has more effective range and velosity than the 7.62×39 The defensive edge probably would go to to the 7.62×39 because of the firearms I can also find 7.62x63mm/.30/06 Springfield and 7.62x51Rmm/.30/30 Win and in Canada the 7.7x57Rmm/.303 British.
Beware, custom loaders! In addition to differences in the chambers of .308 Win and 7.62x51mm barrels, there is a critical difference in the brass.
.30-06 is equal or superior in every other aspect. . 30-06 has greater case capacity and can load the exact same bullets as 7.62×51 to higher velocity leading to a slightly flatter trajectory and slightly higher impact velocity and energy. . 30-06 can also be loaded with a wider range of bullet weights than.
7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester – History. Doing the 1940s and early 1950s, military rocket surgeons wanted to improve the effectiveness of the M1 While commercial .308 ammo may have slightly higher pressure than 7.62x51mm NATO, it's really the brass and chambers that are the issues to understand.
<img src='https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qp2Zb3uP4ok/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEjCNACELwBSFryq4qpAxUIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJDeAE=&rs=AOn4CLCvwuTcXw25k-mdT-bmab9L1l_vdQ' alt='30-06 vs. .308 What is the difference?.
‘ class=’alignleft’>The 7.62×51mm NATO cartridge approaches the ballistic performance of the original U.S. military .30-06 Springfield M1906 service cartridge. Modern propellants allowed for similar performance from a smaller case with less case capacity, a case that requires less brass and yields a shorter cartridge.
May 09, 2019 · Opinion.308 vs 7.62×51 Ammunition. Ft Collins, CO –-(Ammoland.com)- As most of us know, 5.56×45 is the “militarized” version of the civilian 223 Rem varmint cartridge, developed by.
Whereas the mil.spec. for the armor was to defeat .30-06 M-2 AP, the 7.62x54r slightly increased velocity was enough to allow it to defeat the armor at certain ranges. so, in MY opinion, the 7.62x54r wins ballisticly, but loses in cartridge shape, length and design to the more compact and rimless 7.62x51mm NATO.
Makes it sort of a wash IMHO.