There are a couple of things. First being that 9mm vs 7.62 vs 5.56 is a bit of a misnomer: they refer to the bullet's diameter, and not necessarily its overall size. For instance, a 9mm bullet weighs 7.5 grams (115 grain), whereas a 7.62 NATO round weighs about 10 grams (147 grain).
The 5.56 x 45 mm round first came about during the late 1950s as an experimental cartridge for the U.S. Military M-16 rifle. This “small caliber, high velocity” round was desirable because it helped overcome weight and control issues present in the 7.62 x 51 mm round that was used in the previous-generation M-14 rifle.
The result, the M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle (EBR), was a 7.62-millimeter caliber rifle (as opposed to the M4’s 5.56-millimeter) with a Leupold 3.5-10x variable power scope. This combination of a rifle.
Most soldiers and Marines carry 5.56 mm M4s, M16s or M27s. Marksmen, snipers and machine gunners fire the 7.62 mm round or a round of similar size. The Army is working on an intermediate caliber round.
The Army’s version would be capable of fully automatic fire. Arguments for: The 7.62-millimeter round is larger than the current 5.56-millimeter round and more likely to both penetrate the body armor.
In this video, I compare the bullets of the worlds two most popular rifle platforms. The American AR-15 and the Russian AK-47. Let me know what you think.
The LM7 looks a lot like a DM rifle in 7.62 with an adjustable stock. The tone of the AP report posted on HM Forces indicates the Brit military is wavering between the 5.56 SA80A2 and a higher.
Special operations snipers will replace their 7.62 bullets.
new round for its Next Generation Squad Automatic Rifle (NGSAR). Also reported in Army Times, NGSAR will replace the M249 Squad Automatic.
A detailed, exhaustive comparison of the .223 vs 5.56 taken from Gun Digest 2013, the world's greatest gun book. Click here for .223 vs 5.56 information.
The 7.62 has lightly greater muzzle energy than the 5.56. While the 7.62 on average produces kinetic muzzle energy of 1,500 feet per pound, the 5.56 will produce around 1,300. Not a huge difference, but a difference nonetheless. This means that your target will be struck with more force from the 7.62 than the 5.56 NATO.
However, unlike the 5.56×45 and 6.8SPC, it is hard to ‘over-gas’ the 7.62×35!” Warning from another writer: “The 7.62×35 round can be made to “chamber‘ in a 5.56×45 rifle. The 308 diameter bullet.
it really depends.
a 5.56 round fragments out when you hit a hard/solid target, whereas a 7.62 round makes a big penetrating hole through whatever you shoot. the benifits of a 5.56 round is that most of the time you can fit a lot more bullets into a standard magazine such as the M4 or AR 15 (30 rounds).
ChdNorm RE:5.56mm vs. 7.62mm, An old argument but still valid 6/9/2004 12:16:52 AM I always throw my two cents in on the side of the 7.62. I tend to think it's a better general purpose round that the 5.56.
5.56 is likely more survivable than 7.62, and for obvious reasons, but the damage inflicted can be worse. 7.62 does more damage per round, but in the modern battlefield it tends to be overkill. A soldier can carry significantly more rounds of 5.56 than 7.62, and the power differential isn't enough.
Take for instance the US Army’s bouncing from the 7.62 round, then forcing 5.56 down NATO’s throat, before now swinging back in the other direction with Rangers and Special Forces making good use of.
This has probably been discussed before; however, I was not able to use the search function effectively. Bottom line: what are the advantages and disadvantages of the .223 out of an AR platform vs. the 7.62 x 39 out of an AK platform from the perspective of stopping power?
The Army is scrapping its plans for a new, more powerful rifle – A month after officially announcing the competition for a new, more powerful rifle, the US Army is scrapping plans to adopt the 7.62 mm Interim Combat Service Rifle. The Army was looking for a better.
While the 7.62 vs. 5.56 will undoubtedly continue, it comes down to a matter of personal preference. If you like using a bullet that packs a massive punch, then the 7.62 round will be the selection for you. If you're most interested in hunting, the 7.62 is more versatile and will probably serve most of your needs.
7.62 Ammo Fits What Gun 7.62x39mm Ammo . Shop for in-stock single-box and bulk 7.62×39 Ammo at Sportsman's Guide from the brands you trust, great selection and value and ships immediately! Use our 7.62x39mm Ballistics Chart to find out how your Ammo is firing. That said, it is normally fine to shoot quality 7.62×51 NATO ammo in a gun chambered
.308 Win vs 5.56 Nato Cost. Now, compare the 308 vs 556 ammo cost. Usually, bigger projectiles, which are 308 ammo, cost more money. There are a few reasons for this. To keep it simple, they need more material for production. Because of this, the 5.56 Nato ammo is cheaper by about $6 to $7 per box of 20 rounds.
The Truth About Brass Vs. Steel Case Ammo. The 5.56 NATO was originally designed off of the commercial .223 Remington load, and it was adopted by NATO countries in 1961. The concept of the 5.56 NATO was that is was smaller than the previous 7.62 NATO cartridge, which meant troops in the field could carry more of it.
Gun nut, Tom McHale, risks a fight to explain the subtle nuances between 7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester Ammunition. Can you shoot .308 ammo in a 7.62 rifle? Or is it the other way around? USA.
5.56 vs 7.62.
what's better? We cover the famous rounds of the AR-15 and AK-47 in terms of bullet size and velocity to see which is the overall winner. The concept of the 5.56 NATO was that is was smaller than the previous 7.62 NATO cartridge, which meant troops in the field could carry more of it.
7.62 X25 Ammo Vs 9mm Purchase 7.62×25 Tok Ammo at SGAmmo. We sell high quality ammo at discount prices! 7.62×25 Ammo is currently manufactured in several counties for sale to the consumer in the USA including Serbia, Romania and the Czech Republic, and from time. The 7.62X25 ('bout .30 cal.) and 9mm ('bout .35 cal) are a couple of cartridges
The 7.62 does have more energy at the muzzle and more penetrating power, BUT the terminal ballistics suck. 5.56 wounds will be worse than that of the 7.62×39 due to the slow moving, heavy bullet's tendency to do nothing but follow a more or less straight path, while the 5.56 will at least tumble or even fragment.
7.62X39 Vs. .223; If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Proposed amendments would speed up three Army small arms programs – Joni Ernst, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, added the amendment following hearings earlier this year from retired Army generals who testified that the M4 and 5.56 mm round could.
<img src='https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wHu_GInhSF8/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEjCPYBEIoBSFryq4qpAxUIARUAAAAAGAElAADIQj0AgKJDeAE=&rs=AOn4CLAS2S3o25e7fFYgrrPQB5O4ii1Tjg' alt='7.62 VS 5.56.
Head to Head’ class=’alignleft’>For a 5.56×45 vs 7.62×39 debate, the short-range trajectory is probably a little more relevant than long-range trajectory given the applications of these cartridges. For short-range trajectory, we are going to compare our selected rounds out to a distance of 300 yards with the test firearms zeroed in at 100.